Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $174
Availability
MSRP in USD: $174
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 1220 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - €60.9 vs €239.68
- Up to 74% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3450 - €0.4 vs €1.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 51 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3900 - 155 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-3450 Processore
Buy for €239.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
