Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 28% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1840 - 576 vs 450 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €72.66 vs €311.39
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €311.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75735 minutes ago
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
32.601678502259524%
Multi-Core
854
13.650895140664963%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |