Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 4192 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 36% better in Minecraft than Core i7-820QM - 803 vs 591 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
803
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12438 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |