Buy on Amazon
€156.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7740X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7740X is 297 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7740X
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 5 2600 - 135 vs 128 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-7740X - €84.44 vs €156.88
- Up to 43% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-7740X - €0.66 vs €1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-7740X - 65 vs 112 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7740X - 12 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7740X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
56%
Price, €
€156.88
53%
FPS Winner
Intel - Processore core i7-7740x (kaby lake-x) quad-core 4.3 ghz socket lga 2066 boxato moltiplicatore sbloccato (dissipatore escluso)
Buy for €156.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.44
100%
Value Winner
AMD YD2600BBAFBOX Processore Ryzen 5 2600 Socket AM4 3.9Ghz Max Boost, 3,4Ghz Base+19MB
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7740X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7740X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
4.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 112 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
43.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
