Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2744 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €188.88 vs €484.66
- Up to 57% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i9-13900F - €0.61 vs €1.43 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-6700 - 338 vs 309 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 32 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
309
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
338
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
42%
Price, €
€484.66
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €484.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |