Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4930K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4930K is 1220 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Performs up to 0% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G3930 - 212 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-4930K - €50.95 vs €182.45
- Up to 72% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-4930K - €0.24 vs €0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
211
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4930K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |