Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-3667U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2146 days newer than Core i7-3667U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3667U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 24% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i7-3667U - 113 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3667U - 12 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 302 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3667U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |