Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i7-2960XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3775 days newer than Core i7-2960XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2960XM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-2960XM - 110 vs 92 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
110
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2960XM | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |