Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i7-10750H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 129 days older than Core i7-10750H.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10750H
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 45 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 7% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-10750H - 396 vs 370 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10750H - 64 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10750H | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |