Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 1904 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 27% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 194 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 85 vs 280 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell-E |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
