Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2401 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-4800MQ - 192 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 47 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 47 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
