Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 and the cheaper Core i7-10700F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €278.88 vs €444.99
- Up to 37% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-10900 - €1.68 vs €2.65 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-10700F - 168 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
166
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€278.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €278.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.65/FPS
63%
Price, €
€444.99
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for €444.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |