Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 559 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - €223.65 vs €438.88
- Up to 49% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-9900K - €1.1 vs €2.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 0% better in Valheim than Core i7-10700F - 205 vs 204 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€223.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €223.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.14/FPS
51%
Price, €
€438.88
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €438.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |