Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 10% better in Rust than Core i7-6700T - 204 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €196.26 vs €255.66
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €255.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Buy for €196.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1183
73.38709677419355%
Multi-Core
3566
49.315447379338956%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |