Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 48% better in F1 23 than Core i5-3470S - 235 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €42.73 vs €258.88
- Up to 75% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i7-10700F - €0.27 vs €1.1 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
235
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
24%
Price, €
€258.88
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 417 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
159
67%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 416 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-3470S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |