Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1713 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Celeron G1840 - 151 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - €72.66 vs €129.0
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74266 minutes ago
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74265 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
36.64731494920174%
Multi-Core
854
17.666528754654532%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |