Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1764 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than Core i5-6600K - 227 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-6600K - €151.33 vs €188.88
- Up to 20% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i5-6600K - €0.67 vs €0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |