Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1221 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6200 - 188 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 91 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |