Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2985 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 6% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-6200 - 123 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€141.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |