Buy on Amazon
€10.43
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $176
Availability
MSRP in USD: $176
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2553 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Up to 80% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - €10.43 vs €50.95
- Up to 79% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Celeron G3930 - €0.05 vs €0.24 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i5-650 - 209 vs 204 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i5-650 - 51 vs 73 Watts
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
BQTEC Intel Core i5-650 3.20 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 4 MB Cache 73 W CPU Processore LGA 1156
Buy for €10.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Core i5-650
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-650 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 73 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
