Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i5-540M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4380 days newer than Core i5-540M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-540M
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 99% better in FIFA 23 than Core i5-540M - 175 vs 88 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-540M doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-540M | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Arrandale | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |