Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-5300U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 914 days newer than Core i5-5300U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5300U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-5300U - 201 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5300U - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5300U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |