Buy on Amazon
€102.38
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 273 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 36% better in War Thunder than Pentium G645T - 171 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-4670K - €25.66 vs €102.38
- Up to 67% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-4670K - €0.2 vs €0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 35 vs 84 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Intel Core I5-4670K 3,4GHz LGA1150 6MB Cache Haswell Boxed CPU No Cooler
Buy for €102.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11782 minutes ago
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
126
73%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Processore Intel Pentium G645T Usato for Desktop 2-Core 2-Thread 2,5 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11781 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 84 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
