Buy on Amazon
€107.37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 599 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-4100 - 134 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-4670K - €22.88 vs €107.37
- Up to 78% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-4670K - €0.18 vs €0.8 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core I5-4670K 3,4GHz LGA1150 6MB Cache Haswell Boxed CPU No Cooler
Buy for €107.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
Hegem AMD FX-Series FX4100 FX-4100 FX 4100 Processore CPU Quad-Core Quad-Thread da 3,6 GHz FD4100WMW4KGU Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
