Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3404 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - €107.37 vs €270.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13600KF - €0.83 vs €1.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4670K - 158 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
129
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€107.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €107.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Buy for €270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |