Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570K is 177 days older than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than FX-6300 - 192 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-3570K - €38.99 vs €49.97
- Up to 19% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-3570K - €0.21 vs €0.26 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 6 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €49.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13746 minutes ago
Buy for €38.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13746 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570K | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |