Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €42.73 vs €379.64
- Up to 88% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.09 vs €0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 15% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-3470S - 529 vs 461 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
461
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
529
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
12%
Price, €
€379.64
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |