Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Core i5-3427U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 332 days newer than Core i5-3427U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3427U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-3427U - 448 vs 442 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3427U - 6 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3427U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3427U | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
