Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3399 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 10% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-2500K - 176 vs 160 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - €200.0 vs €414.81
- Up to 56% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-2500K - €1.14 vs €2.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 12 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
160
90.9090909090909%
Value, €/FPS
€2.59/FPS
44.01544401544402%
Price, €
€414.81
48%
Buy for €414.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51501 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
176
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€200
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51502 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
44.92350486787204%
Multi-Core
1921
33.40288645452964%
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |