Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i5-2300 vs Celeron G3900

Core i5-2300 vs Celeron G3900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1696 days newer than Core i5-2300.

Advantages of Intel Core i5-2300

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900

  • Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-2300 - 170 vs 169 FPS
  • Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-2300 - 51 vs 95 Watts
This is a free version of Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0.
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

Intel Core i5-2300 Logo
Core i5-2300

Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011


FPS

169

99%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

170

100%

Value, €/FPS

€0.36/FPS

100%

Price, €

€60.9

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray

Buy for 60.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 191 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

Intel Core i5-2300 Logo
Core i5-2300

Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i5-2300 Logo
Core i5-2300

Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011


Single-Core

510

87%

Multi-Core

1490

100%

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

100%

Multi-Core

992

66%

Intel Core i5-2300 Logo

Intel Core i5-2300

vs
Intel Celeron G3900 Logo

Intel Celeron G3900

Jan 9th, 2011Release Date
Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5CollectionCeleron
Sandy BridgeCodenameSkylake
Intel Socket 1155SocketIntel Socket 1151
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4
Cores2
4
Threads2
2.8 GHzBase Clock Speed2.8 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
95 WTDP
51 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
28.0xMultiplier28.0x
Intel HD 2000Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 510
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.