Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4336 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-2120 - 131 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €61.99 vs €201.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13400F - €0.56 vs €1.53 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €201 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
111
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€61.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €61.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i3-2120 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |