Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3677 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €61.99 vs €208.88
- Up to 67% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11600K - €0.42 vs €1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-2120 - 164 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 12 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
149
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€61.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €61.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13444 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
33%
Price, €
€208.88
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13444 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |