Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3138 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4670K - 204 vs 184 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - €107.37 vs €140.52
- Up to 16% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-12400F - €0.58 vs €0.69 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
84%
Price, €
€140.52
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for €140.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
184
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€107.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €107.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |