Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1587 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 17% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 208 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €159.9 vs €379.64
- Up to 64% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.77 vs €2.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 16 vs 12 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€159.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €159.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
178
85%
Value, €/FPS
€2.13/FPS
36%
Price, €
€379.64
42%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |