Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €208.88 vs €484.76
- Up to 56% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-12900F - €0.94 vs €2.12 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-11600K - 229 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 24 vs 12 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
222
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18028 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
44%
Price, €
€484.76
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €484.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18027 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |