Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €208.88 vs €556.88
- Up to 60% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-13900KF - €0.96 vs €2.41 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-11600K - 231 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 32 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
217
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18127 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.41/FPS
39%
Price, €
€556.88
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €556.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |