Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €208.88 vs €554.03
- Up to 60% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €1.47 vs €3.69 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11600K - 150 vs 142 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 32 vs 12 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
94%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.69/FPS
39%
Price, €
€554.03
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €554.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |