Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4130T - 200 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - €30.28 vs €147.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11500 - €0.17 vs €0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11500 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
22%
Price, €
€147.99
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4386 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
177
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4386 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11500 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |