Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2985 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-6200 - 136 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €139.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 568 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |