Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 2177 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 129% better in League of Legends than FX-6200 - 119 vs 52 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
