Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 427 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 24% better in War Thunder than FX-6200 - 159 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 47 vs 125 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 3 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
