Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Core i5-4670K - 153 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - €109.7 vs €218.78
- Up to 49% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-10600 - €0.73 vs €1.43 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
51%
Price, €
€218.78
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €218.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
150
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €109.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |