Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 373 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-9100F - 580 vs 554 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - €128.88 vs €218.78
- Up to 39% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10600 - €0.23 vs €0.38 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
580
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
60%
Price, €
€218.78
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €218.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
554
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |