Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 129 days newer than Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i3-9100T - 177 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 6 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€142.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €142.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1710 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
87.30043541364296%
Multi-Core
3178
65.74265618535374%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |