Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 693 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - €128.88 vs €292.01
- Up to 38% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-11900K - €0.36 vs €0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 39% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-9100F - 500 vs 360 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
360
72%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13407 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
500
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
62%
Price, €
€292.01
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for €292.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13406 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |