Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700X - €128.88 vs €303.02
- Up to 46% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 7700X - €1.22 vs €2.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 27% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-9100F - 135 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
106
78%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14117 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.24/FPS
54%
Price, €
€303.02
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €303.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |