Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 461 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €128.88 vs €342.73
- Up to 61% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-10850K - €0.37 vs €0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-9100F - 362 vs 347 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
347
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16845 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
362
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
38%
Price, €
€342.73
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €342.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16845 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |