Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 759 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - €99.04 vs €349.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-10900K - €0.66 vs €2.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i3-8100T - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 20 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
149
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.27/FPS
29%
Price, €
€349.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €349.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |