Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1639 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €99.9 vs €612.99
- Up to 81% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-13900K - €0.85 vs €4.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-8100T - 139 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
118
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.41/FPS
19%
Price, €
€612.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €612.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |