Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 759 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €99.96 vs €438.72
- Up to 74% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900 - €0.19 vs €0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 15% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-8100T - 596 vs 517 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 20 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
517
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
596
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
25%
Price, €
€438.72
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €438.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |